Edo Creates FXX-clone For The Street

Since Ferrari needed to test future technology, to be implemented on upcoming models, the FXX was born. It was one serious piece of kit, too. Sounding nearly identical to an Formula one car, it was designed with only one focus in mind; performance. Herein lies the problem: Ferrari only built 29 and made one more for the Ferrari god, Michael Schumacher.

Source: Motor Authority

So, this got Edo Competition thinking and they went to work on tuning the regular-spec Enzo. The result is staggering: a 6.3 liter V12 producing 840-horsepower and 575 lb-ft of torque. And to get a little more "oomph," Edo says that without mufflers the Enzo XX Evolution should be able to make over 860-horsepower.

In addition, other engine components were modified. This includes: new camshafts, new titanium valve spring retainers and connecting rods, modified cylinder heads, new high-performance exhaust headers, high-flow catalytic converters, mufflers and air filters, and new solid tappets that allow the monstrous engine's revs to climb up the ladder to an unreal 9,600 RPMs.

Read more here...

rp

Ferrari California: Success or Failure?

An interesting subject, I introduce to you the new Ferrari California. Essentially, the car has been unveiled as a revolutionary product for Ferrari's line-up which targets a new demographic, specifically females. Naturally, this has the Ferrari community divided.

Source: Ferrari North America

Source: CarAdvice

The California is a new step for the brand and that is not necessarily a bad thing. The mis-step is seen in the California's lackluster design coupled with a name which represents beauty, exhilaration and a magnificent V12.

Personally, I dislike this vehicle because it is sacrilegious to the California name. The original, 250 GT California Spider SWB was a front-engine V12 and if Ferrari wanted to "do it right," it should have utilized a V12.

Then, there is the design which is quite flawed. The new California reminds me of a Calculus textbook where the vintage 250 GT California is a representation of car pornography; easily one of the top designs in the automotive history. One must note, when looking at a 250 GT California, it is a very simplistic design; however, it does stir something and make you feel. The new California does not do this. Every time I stand back and look at this new vehicle I see a hard-top wannabe Mercedes-Benz SL targeted at Rodeo Drive mothers.

Looking at the design of the new California, there appears to be little mistakes which eventually add up to a big catastrophe. One area that bothers me is the side profile. Do not get me wrong, the car's side profile is probably one of its best attributes; however, that side crease appears as though it was placed there to break up the design. The way it twists and digs into the aluminum body is gut wrenching. Perhaps it would have been wiser to stick with a sleek, smooth body while emphasizing the rear bonnet a la 250 GT California which appears to become "pinched".

Which brings me to the next design issue, the rear bonnet. A problem with the new Cali, it has been pointed out by many in spy photographs and individuals who have seen it in the flesh, is the sheer scale of the rear bonnet compared to the front of the vehicle. It puts Jennifer Lopez to shame. It makes the front-end look dainty and the rear look gargantuan, proportions are crucial. I cannot harp on this too much though, because there was no way to make a smaller rear end when the design called for a hard-top. I do think this car should have been a rag-top, but, this car has to conform to the latest trends of southern California trophy wives.

The stacked exhaust, you either love it or hate it. At first, I hated it, but after acquiring a Lexus IS-F for a few days, I came to like it. To say it is a copy-cat design from the IS-F is obtuse, it is can be argued it is reminiscent of early Ferrari racers of the past which commonly featured stacked pipes. Yes, I am defending the stacked exhaust.

Probably the most obvious flaw is the chunky black area which runs the entire rear of the vehicle. Encased is the license plate holder as are two disgustingly large rear fog/reverse lights. Since when did Ferrari start creating lights which rival the scale of Infiniti (check out Infiniti's M35/45 if you do not understand). Something tells me these lights could have been integrated in a much more eloquent fashion.

Source: Ferrari North America

Source: Flickr -IJsselstein

Speaking of rear taillights, do not even get me started on these. The recent taillight treatments seen on the F430 and Enzo are not appealing in my eyes and this one does not get much better. Bad Pininfarina, bad.

The new California's face is actually the car's best feature. Sure, the headlights have a slightly Japanese look to them and the car's grille should be slightly less happy, but overall there is not much to nit-pick. One aspect which was carried out very nicely was the hood scoop; very unassuming and subtle. Well played, Pininfarina.

In reality, design can be something which can grow on anyone over time. It is not something I will remain very critical on because I am sure in the flesh the California will somehow "make it work." The sour grapes on this car remain in the goal of this vehicle; to be mass marketed as a practical Ferrari in an attempt to take sales from Bentley's Continental GT.

I would have loved to see Ferrari create something just for the sake of making a stellar vehicle, not trying to steal sales using a shoddy design, a largely Maserati underpinning and a legendary name. The company is better than that, at least, I hope.

I predict this car will sell out, quickly. But, do not expect it to be to Ferrari enthusiasts - probably those "status-seekers" looking to tool around town in the latest and greatest. I wonder what Ferrari's next step will be after this. Time will tell.

This car will remain successful in sales and production; however, it will remain a failure to Ferrari's branding.

rp